Skip to main content
Coding Prompts

ChatGPT Prompts for Coding That Actually Work

Stop struggling with boilerplate code reviews and cryptic bugs. These field-tested prompts turn ChatGPT into your always-available senior developer.

12 prompts|By PlugMonkey Team, Editorial

Whether you're debugging a production incident at 2am or cleaning up a legacy codebase, having the right prompt makes ChatGPT dramatically more useful as a coding partner. These prompts are designed to produce structured, actionable output — not vague advice. Each one is tuned for real development scenarios, from writing unit tests to optimizing slow SQL queries. They're written for current frontier models, whose context windows are large enough that you can paste entire files (not just function snippets) and expect feedback on how the pieces fit together. The worked example below walks through running the Debug and Refactor prompts against an intermittent memory leak.

Key Takeaways

  • Today's frontier models have context windows large enough to take ENTIRE files — paste them, not just function snippets. Whole-file context lets ChatGPT reason about system structure, import paths, side effects, and interactions the snippet can't reveal.
  • Debug prompts must include expected behavior, actual behavior, AND the exact error message. Leave any one out and the model has to guess at it. The error message matters most — without it ChatGPT guesses at what's wrong.
  • Treat every answer as a hypothesis to test. In the 2025 Stack Overflow Developer Survey, 66% of developers named "AI solutions that are almost right, but not quite" as their biggest frustration. The Rubber Duck Debugging prompt asks for a way to verify or rule out each cause for exactly that reason.
  • Ask for the ROOT CAUSE explanation before the fix. If you ask 'fix this bug', ChatGPT patches the symptom. If you ask 'identify the root cause, explain why it happens, THEN provide the corrected code', you learn something transferable AND get a better fix.
“Your data is your data. As of March 1, 2023, data sent to the OpenAI API is not used to train or improve OpenAI models (unless you explicitly opt in to share data with us).”
— OpenAI — Data controls in the OpenAI platform · developers.openai.com
Worked example

Chasing an intermittent Node.js memory leak with the Rubber Duck Debugging and Refactor for Readability prompts

Scenario: Say your Express service runs out of memory roughly once every eight hours under production load, and nobody can reproduce it in staging. Fill in the Rubber Duck Debugging prompt with what you actually have: the expected behaviour (flat memory under steady traffic), the actual behaviour (heap climbing until the process is killed, with the exact error line), what you've already tried, and the suspect middleware and route handler. Paste in a summary of two heap snapshots taken an hour apart, showing which object types grew.

Walkthrough: Ask for hypotheses ranked by likelihood, each with the check that would confirm or rule it out, and don't accept a fix yet. Typical suspects for this shape of leak are event listeners attached per request and never removed, caches with no eviction, and closures holding request objects. Run each check yourself with `node --inspect` and fresh heap snapshots; the model can't see your heap, so its ranking is only as good as the summary you gave it. Once one hypothesis holds up, paste the confirmed code into Refactor for Readability with the constraint "no behaviour change except the leak fix", and ask it to name every changed line. Then run the service under load long enough to cover several of the old crash intervals before calling it fixed.

1

Comprehensive Code Review

Please review the following [language] code and provide feedback across these dimensions:
1. Correctness — any bugs, edge cases, or off-by-one errors
2. Performance — any bottlenecks, unnecessary allocations, or O(n²) patterns
3. Readability — naming, structure, comment quality
4. Security — any injection risks, exposed secrets, or unsafe operations
5. Best practices — adherence to [language/framework] conventions

Code:
[paste your code here]

Format your response as a numbered list under each dimension heading. Flag critical issues separately.
Replace [language] with your stack (e.g., TypeScript, Python, Go) and [framework] with React, Django, etc.
2

Rubber Duck Debugging

I have a bug in my [language] code and I need help debugging it systematically.

**What the code is supposed to do:**
[describe expected behavior]

**What it actually does:**
[describe actual behavior, including any error messages]

**What I've already tried:**
[list any debugging steps you've taken]

**Relevant code:**
[paste the suspicious section]

Please walk me through likely root causes, starting with the most probable. For each hypothesis, tell me exactly how to verify or rule it out.
The more specific you are about what you've already tried, the faster ChatGPT can identify what you're missing.
3

Refactor for Readability

Refactor the following [language] code to improve readability and maintainability without changing its behavior.

Goals:
- Extract magic numbers and strings into named constants
- Break long functions into smaller, single-responsibility functions
- Improve variable and function names to be self-documenting
- Remove redundant comments while adding clarifying ones where logic is non-obvious
- Apply [language] idiomatic patterns where appropriate

Original code:
[paste code here]

Show me the refactored version with a brief explanation of each significant change you made.
Specify any constraints, like 'must stay compatible with Node 16' or 'no new dependencies.'
4

Generate Unit Tests

Write comprehensive unit tests for the following [language] function using [testing framework, e.g., Jest/Pytest/Go testing].

Function to test:
[paste your function]

Cover these test cases:
1. Happy path — expected inputs producing expected outputs
2. Edge cases — empty input, null/undefined, zero, empty array, maximum values
3. Error cases — invalid types, out-of-range values, and expected exceptions
4. Boundary conditions specific to this function's logic

Format each test with a descriptive name following the pattern: "should [do X] when [condition Y]". Include setup and teardown where needed.
If your function has side effects or dependencies, ask ChatGPT to also show you how to mock them.
5

Explain Complex Code

Explain the following [language] code to me as if I'm a [junior developer / senior developer unfamiliar with this library / non-technical stakeholder].

Code:
[paste code here]

Please cover:
1. What this code does at a high level (2-3 sentences)
2. A line-by-line or block-by-block walkthrough of the key logic
3. Any non-obvious patterns, design choices, or gotchas
4. What would break if I removed or changed [specific part of the code]
Adjusting the audience level (junior vs. senior) dramatically changes the quality and relevance of the explanation.
6

API Design Review

Review the following REST API design and suggest improvements.

API specification:
[paste your endpoint list, request/response shapes, or OpenAPI spec]

Evaluate the design against these criteria:
1. RESTful conventions — proper use of HTTP verbs, status codes, and resource naming
2. Consistency — naming conventions, response envelope structure, error format
3. Versioning strategy — is it future-proof?
4. Security — authentication, authorization, rate limiting considerations
5. Developer experience — is this intuitive for a new API consumer?

Provide a revised version of any endpoints that need changes, with a rationale for each change.
Include example request/response payloads to get more precise feedback.
7

Optimize SQL Query

Optimize the following SQL query for performance. The database is [PostgreSQL / MySQL / SQLite / SQL Server].

Current query:
[paste your SQL]

Table schema and indexes:
[paste CREATE TABLE statements and existing indexes]

Approximate row counts: [table_name]: [row count], [table_name]: [row count]

Please:
1. Identify the performance bottlenecks (e.g., full table scans, missing indexes, N+1 patterns)
2. Rewrite the query with optimizations applied
3. Suggest any indexes that should be created
4. Explain the expected performance improvement for each change
Including EXPLAIN or EXPLAIN ANALYZE output in your prompt will help ChatGPT give much more targeted advice.
8

Write a Regex Pattern

Write a regular expression that matches the following pattern in [language/flavor, e.g., JavaScript, Python re, PCRE].

Pattern to match:
[describe what you need to match, e.g., "US phone numbers in formats like (555) 867-5309, 555-867-5309, and 5558675309"]

Requirements:
- Must match: [list valid examples]
- Must NOT match: [list invalid examples that might look similar]
- [Any additional constraints: anchored to line, case-insensitive, etc.]

Provide:
1. The regex with explanation of each group/token
2. A code snippet showing how to use it in [language]
3. Any known edge cases where it might fail
Always provide concrete examples of strings that should and should not match — this eliminates ambiguity.
9

Generate API Documentation

Write API documentation for the following [language] function/class/module.

Code:
[paste your code]

Generate documentation in [JSDoc / Python docstring / Go doc comment / Markdown] format that includes:
1. A one-sentence summary
2. Detailed description of what it does and when to use it
3. Parameters table with name, type, required/optional, and description
4. Return value description with type
5. At least 2 concrete usage examples showing real-world scenarios
6. Notes on any known limitations, side effects, or important behavior
If the function has complex business logic, briefly describe the business context so the docs make sense to future maintainers.
10

Code Migration Assistant

Help me migrate the following code from [old technology/version] to [new technology/version].

Current code ([old technology]):
[paste your code]

Migration goals:
- Target: [new technology, e.g., "React class components to React hooks", "Python 2 to Python 3", "CommonJS to ES Modules"]
- Maintain identical behavior
- Apply modern patterns and best practices of the target
- Flag any functionality that doesn't have a direct equivalent

Provide:
1. The migrated code
2. A summary of every change made
3. Any manual steps I still need to take (e.g., package updates, config changes)
For large files, migrate one function or section at a time to keep context focused.
11

Design a Data Structure

Help me design the right data structure for the following problem.

Problem description:
[describe what you need to store and what operations you need to perform]

Constraints:
- Expected data volume: [e.g., "~1 million records"]
- Most frequent operations: [e.g., "fast lookup by user ID, range queries by date"]
- Write vs. read ratio: [e.g., "90% reads, 10% writes"]
- Language/environment: [language and whether in-memory or persistent]

Please:
1. Recommend a data structure (or combination) with justification
2. Show a concrete implementation in [language]
3. Analyze time and space complexity for the key operations
4. Mention any trade-offs compared to alternative approaches
Being specific about the operation frequency profile is the key to getting the right recommendation.
12

Security Audit Checklist

Perform a security audit on the following [language/framework] code and identify potential vulnerabilities.

Code:
[paste your code]

Application context:
- Type: [e.g., REST API, web app, CLI tool]
- Handles user data: [yes/no, what kind]
- Authentication method: [e.g., JWT, session cookies, API keys]
- External dependencies used: [list key libraries]

Check for:
1. Injection vulnerabilities (SQL, NoSQL, command injection, XSS)
2. Authentication and authorization flaws
3. Sensitive data exposure (hardcoded secrets, logging PII)
4. Insecure deserialization
5. Dependency vulnerabilities
6. Missing input validation and sanitization

Rate each finding as Critical / High / Medium / Low with a code-level fix recommendation.
Never paste real credentials or PII into ChatGPT. Sanitize your code before sharing it.

The Numbers Behind These Prompts

Every figure below cites a primary source. Click through to verify.

84%

Share of respondents to the 2025 Stack Overflow Developer Survey using or planning to use AI tools in their development process, up from 76% the year before. In the same survey more developers distrust the accuracy of AI output (46%) than trust it (33%), which is why the Code Review and Security Audit prompts ask for findings you can check line by line.

Source: Stack Overflow — 2025 Developer Survey: AI2025

66%

Developers in the same survey who named "AI solutions that are almost right, but not quite" as a frustration, the most-cited one; 45% said debugging AI-generated code takes more time. Run the Generate Unit Tests prompt against any AI-written function before you merge it.

Source: Stack Overflow — 2025 Developer Survey: AI2025

5.2% / 21.7%

Average share of hallucinated packages in code from commercial and open-source models respectively, across 576,000 samples from 16 LLMs; the researchers logged 205,474 unique made-up package names. That is the reason to check every import before trusting the rest of a generated function.

Source: Spracklen et al. — We Have a Package for You! A Comprehensive Analysis of Package Hallucinations by Code Generating LLMs (USENIX Security 2025)2025

Common Mistakes (and How to Fix Them)

The most frequent ways these prompts go wrong — and the small phrasing changes that turn them around.

Mistake

Pasting code without the actual error message or stack trace

Fix

ChatGPT debugging works far better when you paste the exact error output, not your paraphrase. 'It crashes on save' is unhelpful; 'TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading customerId) at OrderService.process (orders.ts:147:34)' lets the AI trace the bug. Always include the full stack trace, not just the top line.

Mistake

Trusting AI-generated code that calls libraries you haven't verified exist

Fix

ChatGPT confidently hallucinates package names ('install xyz-lodash-validator'). Always check generated import statements against your package.json or run `bun install` and catch the error before you trust the rest of the function. A USENIX Security 2025 study found an average of 5.2% hallucinated packages in code from commercial models and 21.7% from open-source ones.

Mistake

Using ChatGPT to refactor code you don't understand into code you understand less

Fix

If the AI's refactor produces code where you can't explain what each line does, do not merge it. The refactor is hiding complexity, not removing it. Reply 'Walk me through why each change matters' before accepting. If the explanation doesn't make the code clearer to YOU, the refactor is regressing the codebase.

Mistake

Asking 'Is this code secure?' instead of asking about specific attack vectors

Fix

Generic security review prompts produce generic OWASP-style checklists. Ask 'Trace user input through this code from req.body to database query — flag every place input is not validated or parameterized.' Specific attack-vector framing produces specific findings.

Mistake

Letting the AI write unit tests without specifying what failure modes to cover

Fix

Generic 'write unit tests for this function' produces happy-path tests that pass trivially. Ask: 'Write tests covering: (1) empty input, (2) null/undefined, (3) the documented edge case at boundary value X, (4) the race condition described in this comment, (5) the realistic failure that would page on-call.' The output goes from coverage-padding to actually-protective.

How to Use These Prompts

Copy any prompt above, fill in the bracketed placeholders with your specific code and context, then paste it into ChatGPT. For best results, use a current flagship model with a large context window when submitting entire files. Keep each conversation focused on a single task — code review, debugging, or refactoring — rather than asking for everything at once. If you use Prompt Anything Pro, you can save responses to your library and open its template palette from the keyboard on any webpage (Pro adds custom templates for your own prompts).

Need More Prompts?

Get personalized AI suggestions for additional prompts tailored to your specific needs.

AI responses are generated independently and may vary

Frequently Asked Questions

Save Your Coding Prompts as Reusable Templates

Prompt Anything Pro lets you highlight code on any webpage — including GitHub and Stack Overflow — and run a prompt on it from a keyboard-driven template palette.